Tom,  

 

I love your post and have thought about this conundrum many times, but then
I realized that there are some built in checks and balances. First, as a
public service, some auctions charge buyer AND sellers premiums in order to
keep the prices more level and make sure all buyers and seller pay their
"fair" share. And, since that may not be enough to stabilize the hobby, some
arranged to legally shill bid so that if the poster universe gets overtaken
with anarchy and something is about to sell for that aforementioned
"outrageously low price", the Shill can ride to the rescue and save us from
a Wall Street like meltdown. A "bail-out" program, if you will. And just
like a wall street bail-out, the  bail -out money will only go to the rich &
conniving and will not disturb the masses of poster collectors who would not
know how to properly use the money.  

You see, Tom, all is not lost. You just need to put your trust in your
religion and your guns and those in power will protect you. 

 

Oh, but do keep some posters as oil prices about to skyrocket. Traditionally
I think window cards make the best insulation.

 

 

 

From: MoPo List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Johnson
Tom
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 1:58 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [MOPO] Truly outrageous deals!

 

I keep hearing from consignment houses that they can get the best prices for
my posters. But the same outfits bombard me with notices about the
outrageously low prices on the items they are selling, and the "steals" that
are to be had. So which is it? By my simple math one of those claims is
bullshit. I'm preparing to sell some of my collection, but don't want it to
be "stolen," or sold at outrageously low prices. But as a collector of
course I want those "crazy" deals. I think my foolproof solution is going to
be that I will buy only from the outrageously low prices guys, and sell only
through the "outrageously high," "truly ridiculously expensive." 

But I do not encourage you all to do the same, because if everyone followed
my foolproof method, then nobody would consign to the outrageously low
fellows, and nobody would buy from the outrageously high fellows. The
consignment biz would grind to a halt, plunging our already fragile economy
back into another dark age. But if that happens, I have a plan to get me
through the downturn:

My attic needs insulation, so until this dilemma gets sorted out by sharper
minds than mine, maybe I'll stuff the posters I would otherwise sell into
the gaps in the joists, and let them age. I've heard that posters treated
like this are sometimes incredibly valuable. Most
formerly-used-as-attic-insulation posters I've read about went for thousands
of dollars each. Those of us with attics will all be rich, if we are
patient. If you do not have an attic, you should buy one before housing
prices rebound--they are thick on the ground around here.

Discussion question: Do one-sheets make better insulation than half sheets?
The lighter paper makes the former easier to crumple--I know this from much
practice in shipping things I sell on Ebay--but maybe the heavier half-sheet
paper is a superior insulator? "R-Value" is the term used for rating
insulative quality, so maybe R-rated posters are better, or Rereleases?
I'll leave this to you experts, if you have some spare time in your rigorous
backbiting schedules.

-Tom

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com

___________________________________________________________________

How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: [email protected]

In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to