Howdy Filip,

Welcome to MOPO

ad


________________________________
 From: filip de volder <runbuffy...@hotmail.com>
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU 
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 1:47 AM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] The curious case of the French Blow-Up posters
 

 
hi, i'm new to this forum  but i see there's some same topics as on the nsfge 
site , regarding this blow up poster  i asked Bruce 2 questions : who is the 
foremost french dealer he mentioned  that was unaware of the different blow up 
releases (for such a collectable poster and information as for different 
releases being wildly available to any professional seller who knows what he's 
doing  this is totally unacceptable so collectors should be warned that next to 
an american based " professional " movie poster seller there's also one in 
france buyers should be aware  of )
 
and regarding the links he posted on nsfge for the heritage blow up sales i 
asked where that he could tell from the pictures that one was and the other was 
not original (both with year and palm) as on the pictures they are identical 
unless when i checked them out i was momentarily bitten by stupidity ...
 
no surprises here : no answer from Bruce ... 
 


________________________________
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 23:44:34 +0000
From: s...@platinumposters.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] The curious case of the French Blow-Up posters
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU


I remember when Bruce made a post asking if anyone could show him one of the 
Haggard fakes so that he wouldn't be fooled by one if someone ever sent any 
Universal Horror to him and Grey immediately stepped up and sent one to Bruce 
right away, as that is the kind of guy he is (though I guess Bruce didn't show 
it to any employees as they auctioned a fake Son of Frankenstein card while 
Bruce was out of town not long after).

So I am sure Bruce must have extended the same sort of courtesy to Grey as he 
did to Lieberman.

It's that kind of mutual respect and courtesy between dealers that makes our 
hobby so different from the rest.
We don't have the back-biting and animosity that many other collectibles seem 
to have.



 
-----Original Message-----
From: Franc [mailto:fdav...@verizon.net]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 03:01 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] The curious case of the French Blow-Up posters

Message  
I 
guess after the seeminlgly endless flow of e-mail from Bruce, he was just too 
busy to answer this one! 
-----Original Message-----
>From: MoPo List  [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of Zeev  Drach
>Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 2:36 PM
>To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
>Subject: Re: [MOPO] The curious case of  the French Blow-Up posters
>
>
>I  don?t think we?ve received a response from Bruce to this question, have  we?
> 
>Zeev
> 
> 
> 
>From:MoPo List  [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of Sean  
>Linkenback
>Sent: June 15, 2012 5:23 PM
>To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
>Subject: Re: [MOPO] The curious case of  the French Blow-Up posters
> 
>Bruce,
>did you contact Grey/Heritage before you made this public  posting so that 
>they could "quickly correct it" the way you did with  Cinemasterpieces, or was 
>your first inclination to post the information to  MoPo as quickly as possible?
> 
> 
> 
>-----Original  Message-----
>From: Bruce Hershenson [mailto:brucehershen...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 04:54 PM
>To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
>Subject: Re: [MOPO] The curious case of the French Blow-Up posters
>
>Here is a 
  faster way to the seven items that were incorrectly listed:
>
>http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/film_title/BLOW-UP/type/French%25201p/sort/4/archive.html
>
>This 
  has all the 9 Blow-Up posters we auctioned
>
>These were the two that were 
  correct:
>http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/archiveitem/2010215.html
>http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/archiveitem/7989641.html
>
>Those 
  two have no year under them. The other seven are the ones we auctioned 
  incorrectly.
>
>The release info on them has now been corrected. The 
  original prices are still there until we see what the buyers tell us they 
want 
  to do.
>
>If you want to use the above to create an email that you send to 
  your customers, telling them that we listed SEVEN posters incorrectly,  then 
that is fine with me.
>
>On 6/15/12, Bruce Hershenson <brucehershen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> WHY do you want 
  to see the links? I CAN compile them, but it will take
>> a while, and I 
  don't see the value. So explain to me why and then I
>> will see if it is 
  worth my time to do so.
>> 
>> And I don't see why you object to me 
  sending MY customers to your
>> website.It is like in Miracle on 34th 
  Street where Macy's sent
>> customers to Gimbel's!
>> 
>> 
  Bruce
>> 
>> On 6/15/12, Smith, Grey - 1367 <gre...@ha.com>  wrote:
>>> Yet we still did not get the 
  links?
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Bruce Hershenson [mailto:brucehershen...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, June 
  15, 2012 12:30 PM
>>> To: Smith, Grey - 1367
>>> Cc: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
>>> Subject: Re: [MOPO] 
  The curious case of the French Blow-Up posters
>>>
>>> We 
  mis-auctioned it SEVEN times, and you only did it three times, so 
  we
>>> are
>>> over twice as wrong and negligent as you were! 
  We clearly explained what
>>> we
>>> 
  did.
>>>
>>> Since you took time to post, will you answer what 
  your policy is in these
>>> cases (will you offer refunds?) and will 
  you correct the listings in your
>>> online 
  results?
>>>
>>> Bruce
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 
  2012 at 11:31 AM, Smith, Grey - 1367
>>> <gre...@ha.com<mailto:gre...@ha.com>>  wrote:
>>> Odd as we have no direct link to the auctions from 
  Emovieposter in which
>>> they were incorrectly sold!
>>> 
  Please advise?
>>>
>>> From: MoPo List
>>> [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU<mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU>]
>>> On Behalf Of 
  Bruce Hershenson
>>> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 6:51 AM
>>> 
  To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU<mailto:MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU>
>>> Subject: [MOPO] 
  The curious case of the French Blow-Up posters
>>>
>>> We 
  recently auctioned a French one-panel poster from Blow-Up, and we 
  said
>>> it
>>> was from the first 1967 release, and then 
  Thierry Brahme, co-owner (with
>>> Holiday Russell) of All Poster 
  Forum posted thqt it was a re-release.
>>> That
>>> set us on 
  a journey researching that poster (and the ones from the other
>>> 
  releases) and we came up with the following definitive answers
>>> 
  (corroborated
>>> by all the leading French poster experts and by the 
  fine research
>>> available
>>> on Ed Poole's LAMP 
  site):
>>>
>>> There are three releases, and they look very 
  similar (almost everything
>>> is
>>> the same, except the 
  R70s omits the 1967 from the top Cannes tagline)
>>>
>>> THIS 
  IS ORIGINAL:
>>> "1967" in the top Cannes tagline
>>> 
  "ATELIERS LALANDE 91-WISSOUS - TEL 920.98.75.76"
>>>
>>> THIS 
  IS R69:
>>> "1967" in the top Cannes tagline
>>> "LALANDE 
  COURBET 91-WISSOUS"
>>>
>>> THIS IS R70s:
>>> NO 
  "1967" in the top Cannes tagline
>>> "Ste EXPL Ets LALANDE COURBET 
  91-WISSOUS"
>>>
>>> You can see a visual comparison 
  here:
>>> http://www.emovieposter.com/unused/blowup_research_reference_images.jpg
>>>
>>> 
  Now the above information showed we had just auctioned a R69 as an
>>> 
  original,
>>> so of course we then contacted that buyer and told them 
  what had happened
>>> and cancelled the sale.
>>>
>>> 
  We next went over our ENTIRE history of every auctioning versions of 
  this
>>> French poster, and discovered that we have only once had an 
  original, and
>>> that there were 4 times where we incorrectly 
  identified a R69 as original
>>> and three times where we incorrectly 
  identified a R70s as a R69 (because
>>> we
>>> were given 
  erroneous information some years ago that led us 
  astray).
>>>
>>> Fortunately, we keep accurate records of 
  every past sale, so we contacted
>>> those 7 buyers and offered to 
  take back the seven posters for a full
>>> refund
>>> 
  (including shipping both ways so they lose nothing) or to make a 
  partial
>>> refund if the price they paid was too high based on the 
  false info, EVEN
>>> IF
>>> YEARS HAVE GONE BY, and we long 
  ago paid the consignors.
>>>
>>> Once we have heard from all 
  the buyers we will likely lose many hundreds
>>> of
>>> 
  dollars, but it is well worth it, because it lets our buyers know 
  just
>>> how
>>> much we stand behind everything we 
  sell!
>>>
>>> We then took a quick look at the Internet to see 
  if we could find other
>>> examples that were being sold incorrectly. 
  We found that Dave Lieberman
>>> of
>>> Cinemasterpieces had 
  one for sale that was a R69 but was incorrectly
>>> identified as 
  original, and we contacted him, and he promptly corrected
>>> 
  it.
>>>
>>> We went to Heritage's archive on their site, and 
  discovered that they
>>> obviously had incorrect information (like we 
  did) but they had DIFFERENT
>>> incorrect information than we did, 
  resulting in their selling three
>>> different posters, one from each 
  release, and identifying them
>>> incorrectly
>>> every 
  time.
>>>
>>> This is the original that they sold as 
  R70s:
>>> http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=161216&lotNo=53072>http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=161216&lotNo=53072<http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=161216&lotNo=53072%3Ehttp://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=161216&lotNo=53072>
>>>
>>> 
  This is the R69 that they sold as 1966:
>>> http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=693&lotNo=65245>http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=693&lotNo=65245<http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=693&lotNo=65245%3Ehttp://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=693&lotNo=65245>
>>>
>>> 
  This is the R70s that they sold as R69:
>>> http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=58024&lotNo=54052>http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=58024&lotNo=54052<http://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=58024&lotNo=54052%3Ehttp://movieposters.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=58024&lotNo=54052>
>>>
>>> 
  Now hopefully they will go back and contact the two buyers to whom 
  they
>>> sold
>>> they posters they incorrectly identified 
  (there is no need to contact the
>>> third one, the one who got an 
  original incorrectly marked as a
>>> re-release,
>>> because 
  that person got an incredible buy and is surely happy!). But they
>>> 
  may or may not have a policy of doing this. If they are followers 
  of
>>> "buyer
>>> beware", which so many auctions are, then 
  those buyers are simply out of
>>> luck.
>>>
>>> I 
  also don't know if they will go into their online archive and 
  correct
>>> the
>>> above mistakes, as we do. We always 
  correct any errors in our database,
>>> and
>>> remove all 
  sales where the buyer never paid or they returned the items,
>>> 
  to
>>> keep our database super accurate, but it takes a lot of time 
  and money to
>>> do
>>> so.
>>>
>>> IF ANYONE 
  READING THIS OWNS AN EXAMPLE OF A FRENCH BLOW-UP POSTER, THEN
>>> 
  YOU
>>> SHOULD TAKE IT OUT AND CHECK TO SEE WHICH RELEASE YOU HAVE. If 
  you were
>>> incorrectly sold a re-release as either an original or as 
  the wrong
>>> re-release, then contact the person or auction you 
  bought if from and ask
>>> for a refund or a price 
  adjustment.
>>>
>>> Thanks much to Thierry Brahme, Ed Poole 
  and others who helped in this
>>> research.
>>> --
>>> 
  Bruce Hershenson and the other 26 members of the eMoviePoster.com 
  team
>>> P.O. Box 874
>>> West Plains, MO 65775
>>> 
  Phone: 417-256-9616<tel:417-256-9616>  (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from
>>> 12
>>> to 1 when we 
  take lunch)
>>> our site<http://www.emovieposter.com/>
>>> our 
  auctions<http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/all.html>
>>>
>>>
>>> 
  Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at
>>> www.filmfan.com<http://www.filmfan.com>
>>> 
  ___________________________________________________________________
>>> 
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>>> Send a message 
  addressed to:
>>> lists...@listserv.american.edu<mailto:lists...@listserv.american.edu>
>>> In the BODY 
  of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>>> The author of this message is 
  solely responsible for its 
  content.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bruce 
  Hershenson and the other 26 members of the eMoviePoster.com team
>>> 
  P.O. Box 874
>>> West Plains, MO 65775
>>> Phone: 417-256-9616 
  (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 to 1 when we
>>> 
  take
>>> lunch)
>>> our site<http://www.emovieposter.com/>
>>> our 
  auctions<http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/all.html>
>>>
>>> 
  [cid:~WRD000.jpg]
>>>
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Bruce Hershenson and the other 26 members of the eMoviePoster.com 
  team
>> P.O. Box 874
>> West Plains, MO 65775
>> Phone: 
  417-256-9616 (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 to 1 when we take
>> 
  lunch)
>> our site <http://www.emovieposter.com/>
>> our auctions <http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/all.html>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>Bruce Hershenson and the other 26 members of the eMoviePoster.com 
  team
>P.O. Box 874
>West Plains, MO 65775
>Phone: 417-256-9616 (hours: 
  Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 to 1 when we take 
>lunch)
>our site <http://www.emovieposter.com/>
>our auctions <http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/all.html>
>
>
>
>Visit the MoPo  Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>___________________________________________________________________
>How to UNSUBSCRIBE  from the MoPo Mailing List
>Send a message  addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
>In the BODY of your  message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>The author of this  message is solely responsible for its content.
 
>
>Visit the MoPo  Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>___________________________________________________________________
>How to UNSUBSCRIBE  from the MoPo Mailing List
>Send a message  addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
>In the BODY of your  message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>The author of this  message is solely responsible for its content.
>Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>___________________________________________________________________
>How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
>In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>The author of this message is solely responsible for its  content.
 
>
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
 
 
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to