Well, I won't rag on the scope of the scoop from my fellow filmophiles. Criticism is a short cut to creation or witticism, but looking forward to a post on posters by non-pontificating picture pundits who are artful at canvasing the captivating capsules in which some of us are able to be temporary caretakers of (and if we restore at least one scratch or paper with bleach, then we can rest on our hardy laurels knowing we made the cinematic history a better place than we found it--thank you Jaime and anyone whose purview is to allow a delicate posters to still be viewed.) Ralph seems to be a colorful fellow and shares a panoramic panacea of poster high points--and low points, and even mid altitude distribution points from a Lowe's standpoint. The shades of blue and gray from the birth of an intolerant nation (by one of the four United Artists--though a pioneer in avante guard shooting styles, cinematography, and directing prowess) I know will be confidently and will not be ov! ershadowed or censored in a new daze of William Hayes, a non-egnitmatic pious and religiously bias two cents worth on the Nickelodian.
Looking forward to the premiere prose from Wall Street, which will be much more bearable and far less bullish, or BS, than the ticker tape, hackles standing up on the nape, of avarice top percent of our National Domestic Product, which is gross I hear, but no need to net in more cash, just be entertained and get come more animation for your dollar annihilate (or at least the ten percent solution and decimate.) So, two non opposed, but opposable thumbs up for taking the time to type or bribe a transcribe from their Girl, Gal, or Guy Friday to articulate the article or transcription to get into the time slot submission with a double check on any letter omission where those with crosswords would give a puzzling expression to any misplaced dot on a j or an i or any other type of infraction that gets an odious "oh no" from the taciturn type-O personalities. To quote Marcel Marceau, I'd need a clown who could also be a mind-reading stenographer. Or RJK did say (on that University of Pennsylvania prose and con day) that "One-fifth of the people are against everything all of the time." Can't please, or appease, or wipe upturned noses after every sneeze. Or Groucho Marx who would say: "Quotes, unquotes and quotes." "That's three quotes?" "Yes, sir." "Add another quote and make it a gallon." So looking forward to reading the pressheets from a peer-rewieved stylish and still swag rag whose intestinal fiber and pulp to fiber ratio is more reliable or stable from the pulp fiction diatribe diction abbreviated by the poster art keepers as zeros not the heroes who know when to buy a herald and avoid someone a who is blindly grabbing at a boom that is off keel and kilter while jettisoning reasoning and creating a flood of rare paper flotsum while still remaining three sheets to the wind, long in the face, short winded and now in the doldrums of nays in the horse latitudes. WWHD? (What would Hirschfeld Do/Draw? He'd do what he always did and judge a man, or whoah-man, by the content of their caricature. Daniel Kinske (no relation to Klaus the midnight oil burner or Nastasha or Leonid who played Sasha.) On Feb 23, 2013, at 6:18 PM, Tom Martin wrote: >> concise and what ive been trying to mutter all day basically Good > Bruce.. how you did it ill never know...lol kidnappers with clipped > papes.. wonderfull ill remember that one.. >> >> >> ---- Original Message ---- >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [MOPO] DeLuca, Heritage, featured in tomorrow's WSJ >> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 19:53:00 -0600 >> >>> I find that almost all of the reporters I have interacted with take >> down >>> whatever I say and then take out pits and pieces to form what they >> want to >>> say, whether or not it is something I said (kind of like how >> kidnappers >>> make ransom notes out of newspapers). >>> >>> Their standard seems to be not "is this accurate" but rather "what >> will >>> sell the most papers" combined with "can we get sued". >>> >>> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:44 PM, David Kusumoto >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hey Peter - you were caught/used in the standard "space >> constraints for >>>> a throwaway article," just as you described it. When you've been >>>> interviewed many times, you learn over the years that you can end >> up on the >>>> cutting room floor despite spending 30-90 minutes with harried >> writers who >>>> have no time nor interest in what their editors have "assigned" >> them to >>>> write only 500-words about. Writers prefer to pitch their story >> ideas to >>>> editors, not the other way around. It's worse for TV. I am so >> accustomed >>>> to warning clients about the press and managing their >> expectations. The >>>> classic routine is being on camera for 15 minutes and then you get >> sliced >>>> to a 10-second blip on TV - or get completely shut out. For ex., >> watch >>>> your late local news and pay attention to the length of EACH >> story. After >>>> the top 3 stories are "out of the way," about 6-to-15 stories are >> blasted >>>> out which average about 10-15 seconds each. Only the most >> visually or >>>> verbally compelling stuff makes it. Editors do not trust the >> attention >>>> span of readers and TV viewers. For ex., I always tell people >> that in a >>>> 30-minute news broadcast, there's only about 6 min. of actual >> "local" >>>> content. The rest is filled with national, international, sports >> and >>>> weather news - and then about 6 to 8 min. worth of commercials. >> From >>>> beginning to end, it's a sprint. Most news organizations are no >> more than >>>> headline services. And with the advent of social media, it's >> gotten worse, >>>> with "tweets" sent out by newsrooms that are less than 140 >> characters each. >>>> - d. >>>> >>>> P.S. - Many news organizations, esp. the NYT (circulation, 1.6 >> million), >>>> the WSJ (circulation, 2.3 million) and the Washington Post >> (circulation, >>>> 470,000) - all have "exclusivity" rules - i.e., their editors >> REFUSE to run >>>> material run elsewhere unless it can be updated or has >> significance >>>> impossible to ignore, such as a plane crash. Hence the decision >> to >>>> "bypass" elaborating about "Metropolis." While newspapers are >> dying, their >>>> digital / mobile phone editions are keeping them barely alive, >> esp. the >>>> NYT, which finally posted huge gains after recently charging >> readers for >>>> digital content, (something the WSJ has always done). The NYT, >> despite >>>> bleeding red ink, still has the highest Sunday circulation in the >> U.S. (2.1 >>>> million). - d. >>>> >>>> ---- Original Message ---- >>>> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 19:03:10 -0500 >>>> From: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: DeLuca, Heritage, featured in tomorrow's WSJ >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> >>>> Tom, >>>> >>>> I was the other person she contacted for the story. She only had >> 500 words >>>> available and she felt the metropolis had already been done(and >> when she >>>> did mention it, she got it wrong). I asked her what she wanted the >> thrust >>>> of the article to be and I think she just needed to get something >> out >>>> before the AA. As you say it was not particularly accurate. I >> explained in >>>> great detail how the hobby was unique in that the material was >> never sold >>>> to the public, the ways material did flow into collector's hands, >> how >>>> poster exchanges worked, etc. I mentioned off-handedly how some >> people >>>> actually used posters for home insulation years ago(this morphed >> into "huge >>>> caches" of material that can be found in home walls!). It was a >> hastily >>>> done throw-away article. Check the box and move onto the next >> thing. >>>> >>>> -Peter >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: MoPo List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Tom >>>> Martin >>>> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 9:57 AM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [MOPO] DeLuca, Heritage, featured in tomorrow's WSJ >>>> >>>> DID I MISS something??? or did the writer leave out the recent >> Deluca buy >>>> of Metropolis???? at 1 million... U see soem old quotes on earlier >> prices.. >>>> also she nowhere discusses the fact of Ralph Deluca being a super >>>> collector.... >>>> Also The Grey Smith Part was Ok,, but she didnt do her homework >> this woman >>>> From Wall street...she could have given a broader viewpoint and >> offered >>>> some places postes where being collected like Museumsna >> collections.. and >>>> also people like Learn about Postres, and the Poster dealers Like >> the shops >>>> in NYC, andLa, London,,, and auction people like RICH and Bruce... >>>> They should have had You David write the story... perhaps you >> could submit >>>> a story and give it more Gusto.. and more details.. >>>> >>>> It was nice that Wall street attempted a story but it was >> disappointing in >>>> not very accurate.. >>>> >>>> Steven Sansweet who worked at Lucasfilm as a fand club and PR >> person was a >>>> former writer for Wall street and could also have done a good job >> on a >>>> article.. >>>> >>>> this one was disappointing.. what does everyone else think???? >>>> >>>> best, Tom >>>> >>>> ---- Original Message ---- >>>> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 23:05:36 -0800 >>>> From: [email protected] >>>> Subject: DeLuca, Heritage, featured in tomorrow's WSJ >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> >>>> Timed with its weekend pre-Oscar coverage, tomorrow's WSJ has a >> short >>>> article about movie posters with quotes from Ralph DeLuca and Grey >> Smith. >>>> -d. >>>> >>>> [image: wsj-coming-soon-to-an-auction-near-you-02-23-13.jpg] >>>> >>>> >> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142412788732450320457831654070491 >> 3854.html >>>> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com >>>> >> ___________________________________________________________________ >> How >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed >> to: >>>> [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: >> SIGNOFF >>>> MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its >> content. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Bruce Hershenson and the other 29 members of the eMoviePoster.com >> team >>> P.O. Box 874 >>> West Plains, MO 65775 >>> Phone: 417-256-9616 (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 to 1 when >> we take >>> lunch) >>> our site <http://www.emovieposter.com/> >>> our auctions <http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/all.html> >>> >>> * Complete Buyer >>> Protection<http://www.emovieposter.com/unused/20120625ad_emovieposte >> r_no_buyer_beware_buyer_warranty.jpg>- >>> *No time limit on our guarantees & *NO* buyer beware >>> * Hershenson Help >>> Hotline<http://www.emovieposter.com/images/announcements/20120906_mc >> w_ad_hershenson_help_hotline_forsite.jpg>- >>> *Direct line to Bruce (our owner!) for urgent problems* >>> *Also, please read the following three pages of in-depth* Customer >> Reviews *of >>> our company * - Page >>> 1<http://www.emovieposter.com/images/announcements/buyerreviews_page >> 1.jpg>, >>> Page >> 2<http://www.emovieposter.com/images/announcements/buyerreviews_page2 >> .jpg>, >>> Page >> 3<http://www.emovieposter.com/images/announcements/buyerreviews_page3 >> .jpg> >>> *, which shows you in our customers' own words exactly what makes >> our >>> company and our auctions so very different from all others! >>> >>> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com >>> >> ___________________________________________________________________ >>> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List >>> >>> Send a message addressed to: [email protected] >>> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L >>> >>> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content >> . >>> >>> > > Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com > ___________________________________________________________________ > How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List > > Send a message addressed to: [email protected] > In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L > > The author of this message is solely responsible for its content. Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
