[Ham]
> Concerning Marsha's quote from Pirsig's MOQ summary,
> I do not consider the
> MOQ a "method of investigation, a tool for a more
> accurate perception...in
> value perception." I consider it a euphemistic
> perspective, albeit one
> presented with poetic touches. What scientist would
> seriously consider the
> Metaphysics of Quality an "investigative tool"? I
> certainly wouldn't
> presume to claim this for Essentialism. And what
> is "more accurate" about
> a morality that says, "Some things are better than
> others?" Let's get
> "real", Mr. Pirsig!
Let's "get real" Mr. Ham! Your poetic
essentialism with essents... ahh, so nice and painted
so fine. Of course you see Pirsig's philosophy
different from Pirsig himself, and define Pirsig's
philosophy as something that Pirsig himself is wrong
about due to YOUR philosophy is better, right? Pirsig
doesn't know his own philosophy, hmmm? That's your
perspective and painted picture of reality.
woods, woods, woods,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news,
photos & more.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
