Yes Platt, I would agree too ... a tantalising parallel. That's why some of these more enlightened or imaginative views of physics (unconfirmed or not) are attractive to MoQ'ers I believe - those who see the MoQ view as substantially correct - valuable, useful, pragmatic - because of its dynamic core.
(I see Ham is ignoring my detailed comment about the dogmatic process by which science confirms what is "true" anyway.) Ian On 7/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Ron Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > The theory that all is varying forms of inter-related energy works just > > fine for me. It sure works better > > than God , Essent, Dq, prime motivator or any other human convention. > > But wouldn't you admit, Ron, that if energy is defined as "the power to > change" > that DQ would qualify as energy? As for evidence of this energy, > Pirsig cites, among other examples, that of the brujo. "It was the moral > force that had motivated the brujo in Zuni." (Lila, 9) IMO, the "moral force" > is > energy of a creative kind, bring about changes "for the better." Seems to me > the evidence for such an energy is abundant in our evolutionary history. > > Platt > > > > ------------------------------------------------- > This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
