Quoting Ham Priday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > For purposes of clarity, I prefer the term "sensibility" where the precise > locus of awareness is questionable, the absolute case being that of no locus > at all, such as the nature of the primary source (i.e, creator or God). In > my philosophy of Essence, existence is postulated as a duality in which > sensibility (the negate) is separated from an insensible otherness (essent). > To refer to the negate as "awareness" would be confusing and epistemological > incorrect, since in its primary state it is not individuated as a cognizant > organism. When individuation of the self arises (and we understand it as a > process in time) it becomes what I call "value-sensibility", which is always > experienced differentially. > (Incidentally, so is Value, in my opinion.)
Hi Ham, I wonder where "consciousness" fits into your description above. Is it the same as "sensibility?" Is "essent" conscious in any way? And is my cat, UTOE, a self-aware "cognizant individuated organism" with "value-sensibility?" Thanks. Platt ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
