Quoting david buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

>  . . .but 
> when we think of morality of a basic sense of what's good and bad instead of 
> just that set of cultural expectations then we can easily see how getting 
> off the stove was "good". 

>  . . . we have to learn to trust our 
> spontaneous nature. Even in activities that seems to also require structure, 
> practice and precision - things like archery, motorcycling and sailing - we 
> ought to trust that dynamic mode of perception. 


> SOM works well enough to 
> split atoms and go to the moon. When it comes to handling that level of 
> reality, SOM really rocks. Its not that its wrong so much as it is limited. 
> It has a way of putting all the emphasis on those lower levels of reality 
> and/or reducing human things to those levels.

Excerpts I'll clip and save because they sum up important points about the
MOQ in a nutshell, especially the last sentence in the last excerpt above.

Thanks DMB,
Platt




-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to