Hi Ron

Because we can cut experience up.We impose a plurality of
differentiations, experience has the potential to be divided in many
ways. They are actively uncovered and not simply given.

David M

[Ron]
even the electric eye senses light and not light.
Your not understanding a word of what I'm saying. lets just drop it.
all of it. It's really not worth all the bullshit involved,
SA too. It's just not worth alienating you guys over a
a concept that simply can not be communicated.
I value both of you more than some concept about
pre-intellect.
I choose my relationship with you 
over any idea I may have, ultimately.

This is what I value, not being understood, but the relationship
with people I admire and respect.
this is not some egotistical garbage. I simply
refuse
to let this get in the way of our friendship.
lets move on.

I value the good standing with both of you more than being correct by
any means.

with love
and respect.

woods







> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David M
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 9:57 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [MD] subject / object logic
> 
> Hi Ron
> 
> Direct/unconceptualised experience knows nothing of subjects and
> objects.
> 
> 
> regards
> David M
> 
> [Ron]
> Right you are Dave, but unconceptualized experience is sensual
> distinction. How can we
> have concepts about anything if it not distinct.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ron Kulp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 9:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [MD] subject / object logic
> 
> 
>>
>>
>>
>>     [Ron]
>>> ...the focus being on the recognition of things
>> before
>>> one can think about it.
>>
>>
>>     Again, how do you 'know'/'recognize' "things before one can
> think"?
>> This kind of loop, where 'know' is before 'know' is a trapping of SOM
>> thinking I believe.
>>
>>
>>     [Ron]
>>> Again my suspicion is that preintellectual recognition has s/o
>>> distinction and naturally leads to s/o intellection, simply on the
>>> merit that we sense the phenomenal world as objects in relation to
>>> ourselves before we even think about it.
>>
>>     I disagree.  I really don't think about that and I being
separate.
>> I could if I wanted to, but my mind is accepting these cricket
sounds,
>> they pass through me, and I'm really not trying to define a this and
>> that, just a continual stream of events.
>>
>>     [Ron]
>>> I have ducked objects thrown at me before I was aware of the whats
>>> whys and hows of any of it.
>>
>>     I duck all the time to bad, disturbing, immoral, and unvaluable
>> thoughts, are those thoughts not mine?
>>
>>
>> [Ron]
>> I guess what I'm saying is my personel experience has been a level of
>> awareness you describe
>> as a continual stream of events where I'm aware of things without
>> actually thinking about them.
>> there is this state of awareness then there is thinking about things.
>> I'm saying that even in
>> my awareness of continual stream of events  I sense objects other
than
>> me ie. cricket chirping. which
>> I allow to pass through me. I just feel that there are two differing
>> levels of awareness
>> that seem to be getting lumped together somehow in the MOQ
perpective.
>> If you ever got
>> "sucker punched" or been
>> hit by something you were not aware of, there is this split second of
>> pure awareness before
>> the pain sets in and you begin to rationalize just what hit you and
> how.
>> if you've been hit in the
>> back of the head, your vision becomes jumbled and nothing visually
> makes
>> sense for a few moments.
>> experience tells you if this has happened before that more than
likely
>> you're going to get hit again
>> and head for cover if you are unexperienced you are going to pop your
>> head up and look around
>> for what hit you, probably getting it in the face this time. With out
>> intellection and SOM
>> I feel the fist,bottle,shoe hit my face,me. And you have s/o
> distinction
>> before I can think about it.
>> It's just curious. I get confused when Pirsig says there is dynamic
>> quality of the immediate experience
>> and SOM nothing else, to which I ask well what the heck was before
the
>> greeks invention of SOM?
>> someone list the OTHER brands of metaphysics and if it's cultural
then
>> it should be easy
>> to point to OTHER cultural metaphysics should'nt it?
>>
>> Thanks SA, I'm just askin questions, any help would be appreciated.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
________________________________________________________________________
>> ____________
>> Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with
> Yahoo!
>> FareChase.
>> http://farechase.yahoo.com/
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to