Quoting ian glendinning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Spot on Arlo.
> 
> Platt, the point you keep "ignoring" is that your ignorance is often
> the actual subject of correspondence, and therefore NOT an ad hominem
> attack on your doubtful arguments, but valid assertions about you. The
> fact that you keep ignoring this point is consistent with your
> ignorance, as I have also remarked.

Yes, I know. It's been obvious for many moons that if I disagree with
you or Arlo, it's proof (valid) that I am ignorant. The astonishing arrogance
of such thinking is, of course, blindly ignored in your own ignorance. :-)   
 
> And on your point - obviously words mean things, they have
> significance, but not since Wittgenstein has anyone (even anyone in
> the west, except you) thought that the relationships between the words
> and meanings were a matter of logic. They are largely matters of
> culture, as Arlo elaborates.

So what culture do you inhabit? An illogical one?

> Here's a thought. If an "individual" is a convenient fiction, does
> that make Platt and "inconvenient fiction" ?

The better question, since you are fictional, is "Does Ian exist? 

Platt

> 
> Ian
> 
> On 8/30/07, Arlo Bensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [Platt]
> > I wonder what the word for "individual" is in Chinese.
> >
> > [Arlo]
> > This "useful convention" (the "self") is a stable part (and result)
> > of collective activity. But for an interesting aside, consider this
> > from a Cornell study on self-concept, "Contrast of U.S./Chinese
> > memories shows impact of culture on 'self-concept'".
> >
> > "Americans often report lengthy, specific, emotionally elaborate
> > memories that focus on the self as a central character," said Qi
> > Wang, an assistant professor of human development at Cornell.
> > "Chinese tend to give brief accounts of general routine events that
> > center on collective activities and are often emotionally neutral.
> > These individual-focused vs. group-oriented styles characterize the
> > mainstream values in American and Chinese cultures, respectively."
> >
> > http://www.news.cornell.edu/Chronicle/01/6.28.01/memory-culture.html
> >
> > The short reporting of this study concludes as such. ""These findings
> > indicate that cultural differences in autobiographical memory are
> > apparently set by early preschool years and persist into adulthood.
> > They are formed both in the larger cultural context that defines the
> > meaning of the self and in the immediate family environment," Wang
> > concludes. "The self and autobiographical memory are intertwined not
> > only within an individual but also in the overarching cultural system.""
> >
> > --------------------------
> >
> > "This fictitious "man" has many synonyms: "mankind," "people," "the
> > public," and even such pronouns as "I," "he," and "they." Our
> > language is so organized around them and they are so convenient to
> > use it is impossible to get rid of them. There is really no need to.
> > Like "substance" they can be used as long as it is remembered that
> > they're terms for collections of patterns and not some independent
> > primary reality of their own." (Pirsig, LILA)
> >




-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to