At 01:54 AM 9/2/2007, Ham wrote: >Confusion over these MoQ concepts will persist until the terminology is >restructured to reflect common definitions.
Hi Ham, Maybe to be correct, the terminology reflecting a process ontology, the MoQ, should be without nouns or pronouns: river-ing, mountain-ing, people-ing, cloud-ing, cat-ing, object-ing, subject-ing. That pattern is now in a state of chair-ing. The dog-ing is barking. What fun! Marsha Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
