I think it may be more of a personal ethical (although "ethical" is an insufficient/annoying word) code rather than an all encompassing one.
On 11/24/07, MarshaV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Greetings again, > > LILA mentions a code of art, but doesn't really explain it. I > suppose it's staying dynamic, but that's just my guess. Maybe RMP > writes of it in another paper? Creating a painting or a sculpture > isn't acting out of a code art, I wouldn't think. What code? Could > it be a way of making change, without the motive to make change? Is > it a way of paying attention to the moment in a dynamic way? Maybe > it's too much like quality itself, to define it. > > Anyone have any thoughts? > > Marsha > > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > -- "The only thing that separates us from the animals is...well, the truth is nothing separates us from the animals." Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
