hi marsha, i am using 'absolute' as opposed to 'relative'. relative knowledge is knowledge of good and evil, 'absolute' knowledge is the knowledge of the dynamic unity of both - the absolute is Quality / Tao. instead of absolute i could say unconditional...?.
--- MarshaV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I understand 'new myth', but what does 'absolute' > mean? I'm having a > problem with the idea that there exists an absolute > anything, > pre-intellectual or not. > > > At 07:27 AM 11/26/2007, you wrote: > >the problem is not the scientific method. > >the problem is in the interpretation. > >whilst science operates under the inadequate aegis > of > >SOM it will have difficulty understanding the whole > >picture: because it presumes the existence of an > >objective reality separate to the observer. > >quantum physics made this inadequacy glaringly > obvious > >- it still does. how do we interpret quantum > reality > >under SOM? - answer: we can't. > > > >a new context is required and that context is > >emerging. new context = new myth. > > > >the new myth recognises the unity and sentience of > >earth itself - gaia....and by extrapolation the > entire > >cosmos. > > > >as einstein said: the assumption that we are > separate > >is just an optical illusion of consciousness. > quantum > >physics literally shows us the intimate > >interconnection of all space. space and time order > >reality; they are not reality itself. > > > >with an MOQ perspective we can make sense of > >everything because we factor in the primacy of > >undivided experience - pre-intellectual, aesthetic. > >and this is absolute not relative knowledge. it is > >knowledge by communion, by immersion, by > identifying > >with the world, by losing yourself in the world. > > > > > > > >--- MarshaV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Greetings, > > > > > > It seems that the problems with the scientific > > > method have been > > > recognized. Yet it has been anointed the best > > > method for recognizing > > > truth (provisional). If the scientific method > is > > > such a highly > > > valued, but very static, intellectual pattern, > how > > > will a better > > > method (pattern) get recognized? Maybe there's > one > > > emerging, but > > > what would be the probability of me recognizing > it? > > > Everything seems > > > a trap! > > > > > > Chop wood, carry water and paint? > > > > > > Marsha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > > > > >http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > > > Archives: > > > > >http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > > > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > > > > > > > > > > > Make the switch to the world's best email. > Get the new > > Yahoo!7 Mail now. > www.yahoo7.com.au/worldsbestemail > > > > > >Moq_Discuss mailing list > >Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > >http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > >Archives: > >http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > >http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Make the switch to the world's best email. Get the new Yahoo!7 Mail now. www.yahoo7.com.au/worldsbestemail Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
