Hi Bo I think this is wrong because for me the MOQ transforms the objective-knowledge of SOM into the value derived knowledge of experience, a knowledge that is not essentialist or a knowledge about things-in-themselves. MOQ puts the subjective and objective back together because their separation is an impossible illusion, however informative this SOM illusion has been. MOQ redescribes the knowledge of SOM and overcomes it by finding a new way to talk and describe our experience, one that does less to fragment our experience.
David M > Here Pirsig foresees how a MOQ-steeped future may sort out > these things better, but THAT presupposes a 4th. level=SOM that > of knowledge in the objective, truth, sense, just what he speaks of > in this passage. Not the mysterious mental faculty that has been > hijacked by SOM. > > See the SOL interpretation is underpinned and proved gain and > again but these things does not make the slightest dent in your > SOM-based understanding of the MOQ, and I am regarded as an > oddball that flaunts a strange homespun interpretation of the > MOQ. > > > Bo > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
