[Ian]
> No Bo, SA, read that Pirsig quote again ...
> "declared intellectually illegal by the SOM that
> dominates social thought"
> He is saying that SOM is a pattern within this
> intellectual / social
> area of morals, but he is not saying SOM *is* the
> entirety of intellect.
> Just the current dominant pattern ... the problem
> "of our times" for
> the last 300 years or so .... a very low quality
> definition of intellect.
[SA currently]
Ian, I know this. I'm pointing out to Bo where
his line of thinking takes him. Bo is openly stating
that the intellect and society is immoral and
valueless, but he is stating that the moq level (his
interpretation) has the S/O intellect do a "proper
job". Now what that is, I don't know, other than, for
me, it means taking the next step and allowing ones
intellect and society to be moral and the gates of
quality opened to let value in. We need to discuss an
intellect that is healing. A society that is healing.
Bo is not ready to take this next step and allow the
healing process to begin. He's still pointing out the
dilemma.
freezing rain, ice blanketing the trees, shrubs,
grass, but not yet the sidewalk and gravel,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
