Hi all

pragmatism on wiki now includes a mention of Pirsig,
also here's some other stuff from the pragmatism page
and syas something about how radical empiricism
differs from standard:

"James and Dewey were empirical thinkers in the most straightforward
fashion: experience is the ultimate test and experience is what needs to be
explained. They were dissatisfied with ordinary empiricism because in the
tradition dating from Hume, empiricists had a tendency to think of
experience as nothing more than individual sensations. To the pragmatists,
this went against the spirit of empiricism: we should try to explain all
that is given in experience including connections and meaning, instead of
explaining them away and positing sense data as the ultimate reality.
Radical empiricism, or Immediate Empiricism in Dewey's words, wants to give
a place to meaning and value instead of explaining them away as subjective
additions to a world of whizzing atoms.

Daniel Dennett, who argues that anyone who wants to understand the world
has to adopt the intentional stance and acknowledge both the 'syntactical'
aspects of reality (i.e. whizzing atoms) and its emergent or 'semantic'
properties (i.e. meaning and value).

Radical Empiricism gives interesting answers to questions about the limits
of science if there are any, the nature of meaning and value and the
workability of reductionism. These questions feature prominently in current
debates about the relationship between religion and science, where it is
often assumed - most pragmatists would disagree - that science degrades
everything that is meaningful into 'merely' physical phenomena.

Moral questions immediately present themselves as questions whose solution
cannot wait for sensible proof. A moral question is a question not of what
sensibly exists, but of what is good, or would be good if it did exist.
[...] A social organism of any sort whatever, large or small, is what it is
because each member proceeds to his own duty with a trust that the other
members will simultaneously do theirs. Wherever a desired result is
achieved by the co-operation of many independent persons, its existence as
a fact is a pure consequence of the precursive faith in one another of
those immediately concerned. A government, an army, a commercial system, a
ship, a college, an athletic team, all exist on this condition, without
which not only is nothing achieved, but nothing is even attempted. (James
1896)"

Wiki also mentions process philosophers like Bergson & Whitehead under 
pragmatism. 


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to