Hi Steve I understand that view but think it is just wrong because how can we make sense of experiences without this distinction, we can call it private versus shared-public toavoid the SOM associations but the problem with SOM is not the inner/outer distinction but the dismissal of subjectivity as less real. MOQ see inner and outer as both real and both having SQ and DQ aspects.
DM ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 11:55 PM Subject: Re: [MD] The inner world > Hi Joe, > >> IMO Persig would place dq/sq only in this inner world, MOQ, which >> is more >> real than SOM, by including the internal as well as the external. > > I think that the inner/outer split is just SOM. This is just a > defense of SOM's "Subject" for materialists who would deny it and say > objects are all that is real. > > Regards, > Steve > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
