Ron:
> Contrary to Chris, I do not think of it in terms of
> a static entity
> "responding" to some unknown force called dynamic
> quality. That would be
> Looking at it in a subject/object way, which MoQ
> breaks from.
SA: I don't see how saying that static patterns
"responding to some unknown force called" dq is s/o
way. This is how I see it. Wouldn't a human centered
view of reality be more of a s/o way due to a human
centered interpretation is stating a s distinquishes
from o? The s/o way is all about the "distinguishing"
aspect between a subject and an object. This kind of
strict one way street approach to percieving seems
limited. It is a perspective that states one only has
to distinguish between a subject perceiving an object
and that's all. If one can state there is a subject
perceiving an object then they are intellectual. I
mean is that all there is to it? It seems very... I
don't know, narrow, maybe there's another word I could
use, but I can't think of one. Do we really go around
believing that we are intellectualizing when all we
have to do is say 'This is my thought of the tree and
that's the tree I'm thinking about." Sounds
elementary school level, do you know what I mean?
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
