Ham:
> The MoQ is a theory, is it not? Then, theoretically
> speaking--logically--a
> pattern must either be dynamic or static. Well,
> which is it to be, gentlemen?
SA: Dynamic and static are quality. When one asks
'What is quality?' - the question can't have a final
answer. The question has an answer, and then another
answer, then another, and so on, thus, it is dynamic.
The answer is static, but the question remains, thus,
dynamic. You see, Ham, why your having difficulty, it
seems, with dynamic quality being defined as
'movement' is dynamic quality can't be defined. To
state dynamic quality is 'movement' is to answer 'What
is quality?', but the question must remain. When one
tries to hold onto dynamic quality concretely, such as
thinking dynamic is movement, or in other words,
literally movement, then it would be confusing.
Movement provides of 'sense' of dynamic quality, but
dq is like a wild horse that can't be ridden. This is
where the analogy aspect steps in, and so on and so
forth, etc...
woods are trees with deer, and bears, and crows, and
cougars, and wits, and...
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
