> [Platt]
> If Harris opposes dogmatic belief and believes the enemy is 
> uncritical loyalty to any set of beliefs, may I presume he would be 
> against the adulation and religious fervor of followers of Barak Obama?
> 
> [Arlo]
> How are those who favor Obama more guilty of "adulation and religious 
> fervor" than those who favored Romney, or favor either Huckabee or 
> McCain? Indeed, if you follow the "antichrist rhetoric" of the 
> talk-radio buffoons, I'd say that their support of their candidate 
> borders more on "adulation and religious fervor" than anyone on the left.

I guess you haven't seen the religious fervor and adulation at Obama 
rallies? It's like an old fashioned revival meeting. Nothing like the 
relatively reserved response for McCain. 

> Want to strip yourself of this disgusting idiocy? Ask this. "If 
> Harris opposes dogmatic belief and believes the enemy is uncritical 
> loyalty to any set of beliefs, may I presume he would be against the 
> adulation and religious fervor of followers of any political ideologue?"

I presume he would. Wouldn't you? 
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to