Steve, Arlo, Micah, DMB (and Platt)

I can't believe you lot are still humoring Platt's spurious arguments.
How worn-out, dog-eared and useless do they have to be ?
You're all right. I think Steve said it in a word - "irrelevant".
"Distraction and noise" Arlo said ....

Nuff said ?
Ian

On 2/20/08, Arlo Bensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Platt]
> If Harris opposes dogmatic belief and believes the enemy is
> uncritical loyalty to any set of beliefs, may I presume he would be
> against the adulation and religious fervor of followers of Barak Obama?
>
> [Arlo]
> How are those who favor Obama more guilty of "adulation and religious
> fervor" than those who favored Romney, or favor either Huckabee or
> McCain? Indeed, if you follow the "antichrist rhetoric" of the
> talk-radio buffoons, I'd say that their support of their candidate
> borders more on "adulation and religious fervor" than anyone on the left.
>
> But this is just more of the same-old, same-old, tired talk-radio
> nonsense. So much background distraction and noise.
>
> Want to strip yourself of this disgusting idiocy? Ask this. "If
> Harris opposes dogmatic belief and believes the enemy is uncritical
> loyalty to any set of beliefs, may I presume he would be against the
> adulation and religious fervor of followers of any political ideologue?"
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to