> SA previously: Ok, now that we made a path inward,
what would
> you say the sky is. I understand in the quote of
> ZMM sky would be an analogy, but do you think a sky
is
> present that we analogize? Not the analogy of the
> sky, but the sky itself - do you think such a sky is
> present or is everything an analogy of the intellect
> in your perspective?
> Ron:
> Ahh, and here it is, no, complete analogy leaves no
> room for DQ
> The sky is patterns of value, how we perceive it is
> an analogy.
> The analogy changes as the patterns change.
SA: Yes, I completely agree! So, maybe we can return
to the "combination" and "connection" event you
mentioned. This meeting of 'dq-sky' and 'analogy of
sky', these also seem to be related, if not the same,
as 'first-hand experience' and 'that already known'.
I would say they are the same. Do you? Thus, the
meeting of 'dq-sky' and 'analogy of sky' is what you
'project'? Is this summation of what has been
discussed so far correct?
woods,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
