> Ron:
> Practically, assuming that analogies are reality
> is how we sense things, so I would agree that this
> common sense is Pragmatically valid because it
functions as
> reality.
SA: Yes, "functions as reality", but as mentioned,
which you probably keep in mind, what might be "common
sense" to one, is bogus to another, at times. This is
where culture steps in, too. Some biological patterns
would seem "common sense" on a broader scale, but at
times, as we know, culture can override biological
values.
Yet, this "common sense" is still tied in with
what you mentioned as "projecting". Thus, "common
sense" and "projecting" are something that occurs
"between", in "combination", and "connection" with
analogies and non-analogies. What do you think?
Ron:
> This is where the anthropomorphic enters the
> picture.
SA: I would agree to an extent. I see the
combination, and what is being projected as both
anthropomorphic and naturomorphic (if such a word, but
this meaning needs a label). Thus, anthronatromorphic
or something?
Ron:
> I think this is important to be aware of SA,
> For me at least. It enforces the concept of
> Undifferentiated being.
SA: Yes, I see this undifferentiated being on the
horizon of our discussion - hence "This Event" - what
I've been trying to orient this discussion towards.
You've been very helpful and a good conversationalist.
Ron:
> When you mentioned self creation it struck a DQ
> chord.
SA: Yes, we are part of bringing this reality alive.
So, what do you think?
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
