> Ron prev:
> This is where my conversation with Jorge connects to
> this thread. This is where I believe mind and
matter join, if
> everything Is composed of types of energy then
energy falls
> into The same situation as quality, it's value that
> differentiates and brings Form from chaos.
SA: I see what you mean, when you say, "mind and
matter join". This is "This Event" that I'm referring
to, and what I believe you mentioned as "connection"
and "combination". Once the joining occurs, I see a
shift in how the world is experienced throughout
history and until now, the on-going present. How
history and now is viewed in this "join" changes from
the old SOM or samsara view. I also see where your
going with "energy", except I'm not sure what you mean
by, "it's value that differentiates and brings Form
from chaos." There seems to be a lot meaning wrapped
up in this short phrase.
Ron:
There is, value forms patterns of energy which define inorganic patterns
Which define organic patterns, social patterns, intellectual patterns.
The whole casaba. Value distinction.
Ron:
> Sq is an active dynamic balancing act. Domination
> Initiates static collapse to DQ.
SA: You said a mouthful here. I'm going to chop this
up smaller and comment upon each sentence or so to
point out what I understand and what I don't. This
above, I do understand.
Ron:
> I see domination as
> Accelerating the process of change as opposed to
> What sustains a balance is likely to process slower,
SA: Well, it depends on what kind of change, correct?
Domination for a change that is not dynamic and is
not for a higher moral level, this is domination that
will speed the process, but not one that is for the
better. I see what your saying in domination triggers
acceleration, but this are very general terms, and is
the kind of domination, the kind of change. I don't
know what you, if you don't mean what I said here.
Ron:
Right, you got it. Better/worse are subjective interpretations
Of the value act .
Ron:
> Complete balance is again a domination and prone
> To static collapse all the same.
SA: How is "complete balance" these events or "prone"
events? Isn't balance dq and sq working together
well? Thus, dynamic quality, a static latch, the
gumption remains, and this process continues.
Ron:
Balance is, yes. But absolute balance where things become equal
Is a type of domination it is not dynamic any more.
When a see-saw is see-sawing it is in the act of balancing
If one side dominates, say a fat kid, the see-sawing stops.
If there are two fat kids of equal weight perfectly balanced
The see-sawing stops too. But when that see sawing is happening
In balanced harmony, that's the sweet spot where patterns linger
Yet ever open to change. It's the act, the process what gives
Balance.
Ron:
> So Platt has a valid point.
> But where he is wrong is the process. He mistakes
> the process
> For the usher and thinks in terms of extremes.
SA: I'm not sure what you mean here.
Ron:
The value process is prime in the MoQ not
Superiority, superiority is a subjective
Interpretation. the act of value, of dynamic balance
Is what is supreme, much the same way Aristotle
Describes arête as per the golden mean.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
