SA previously:
> ...Yet, books, CD's, drawings in cave's, and with
the internet
> another notch has been raised in how thoughts are on
> their own. For one, how can a biological, social
> human being, with all their thoughts, destroy the
> thoughts contained in the internet? The thoughts in
> the internet show an expansion of freedom in
> thoughts living on their own. What do you think?
> Ron:
> I think those things you speak of are artificial
> Extensions of memory. I don't know SA, I'm leaving
> myself Open.
SA: I agree that these 'keepers of thought' are
extensions of memory. I guess what instigated this
thread on my part was to try to explore how thoughts
are free enough that one can't completely replace the
concept of thought with the concept 'individual' or
'human'. They are not the same, but you did point out
some posts ago in this thread that self is a kind of
thought. So, we do agree on this. I wouldn't mind
hearing what Akshay has to say about this as well.
snow simply falls...
and falls...
and falls...
and falls...
and falls...
and falls...
and falls...
and
falls...
and falls...
and falls...
and falls...
and falls...
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
