Chris:
> Bo has it.
SA: Bo doesn't have it.
Bo:
> > It's too simplistic to speak of "anything that
> doesn't fall into S/O"
> > or "anything not containing subjects and objects".
SA: Well, your SOL is too simplistic then.
Chris:
> This I think is worth underlining a thousand times
> around,
SA: I don't.
Chris:
> because I think
> here is the core of the unwillingness to accept the
> SOL.
SA: SOL? What's that?
Chris:
> The thing is, that now that S/O based rationality
has begun to really
> take control (in some
> parts of the world) all other patterns are affected.
> Not in their quality
> reactions of course, but since higher levels
> dominate lower ones, it is
> bound to be rationality that permeates (?) how all
> of the levels goes about
> their business - because they are being controlled.
> More or less anyway.
SA: Yeah, you like the SOL. And I don't. And so
what? Bo the ego-inflation lives - Arggh,
gobbolie-gop! This is fun. Repeating ourselves over
and over again. Hey, Batman!
Chris:
> The S/O rationality is a powerful thing. One cannot
> enough thank RMP for
> showing the real nature of it. This however doesn't
> mean that we should kill
> it. Just modify it. IMO of course.
SA: Around and around we go. Repeating the same old
stuff due to the hot air of Bo's nonability to
discuss. Just to repeat over and over, "Now, let me
tell you. I'm the only guru on this earth. The SOL
is best, and is because I said so. So, you have to
listen to me, or else your stale and just on the
social level."
wow, Bo, you almost convinced me, hahhahahah!
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
