Quoting ian glendinning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Platt, et al, > > I noticed you make a similar comment just a few posts ago ... > As you might guess I like that meta-intellect idea, I made some > comments before about MoQ as a meta-metaphysics, and some discussion > of meta concepts generally, but I'd not seen the meta-intellect idea > expressed before. Interesting. > > Might break this deadlock with seeing the 4th layer as SOMist > intellect only, if we have the MoQ itself as a meta-intellect. > Something to think about. Thanks for that. > > Ian
Thanks, Ian. I may have stolen "meta-intellect" from Bo. At least he speaks of a meta-level from which we see the validity of the MOQ. Your "meta-concepts" fit right in. I think this is the direction we have to go if we are to move the MOQ off dead center. I would appreciate any thoughts you have about this. Platt ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
