[Ham] First, let's dispense with the precept of "always", since assigning duration is a function of intellection, not reality. From the perspective of Essence evolution is a fait accompli. Accordingly, everything I explain in this elaboration is described in the present tense.
[Krimel] I am unable to comment on the bulk of what you said because it just flat makes no sense at all to me. But I believe I do understand the statement above. I suspect the rest of what you say does not flow directly from the statement above although I suspect it is fundamental to your notion of Essence as 'absolute'. You say, "From the perspective of Essence evolution is a fait accompli." I take this to mean from some Godlike perspective time is static and that we only perceive its directional flow by virtue of being the kind of critters that we are. If this is indeed what you mean then I must point out that the statement is false. This was the kind of universe that Laplace envisioned and everything we have learned since demonstrates that it is just not so. The future is not determined even from God's perspective. History can not be rewound or played forward. Because of indeterminacy if we rewind we can never see the same point we began at originally. If we fast forward, history never ends the same way twice. This is the kind of utterly baseless premise that renders your "therefores" insensible and negates their essence of other aware-beings. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
