At 12:46 AM 4/3/2008, you wrote: > > The individual (self) is process, and that process is valuing. > > If all process shuts down, then the individual will cease to > > exist. The relevance of value to the individual, at least in the > > most basic sense, is it is dependent on value for its existence. > >I like that first sentence, Marsha. It should be set somewhere in large >caps with RMP's signature affixed. As for the rest, it's true that if >process ceases, there is no individual. But it's also true that if there is >no individual there is no existence.
Logic? A very large carrot, indeed, will it take to get me to retrieve those ideas out of storage. At the moment, I'm watching the ground for the Narcissus to pop. Are you equating (If P, then Q) equal to (If ~P, then ~Q)? P being individual. Q being valuing. ZzzzzzzzZzzzzzZz..... >For existence (the object of experience) >and the individual (the subject of experience) >are mutually exclusive contingencies. >Together they actualize value sensibility to >create physical reality. > >Isn't this really what Pirsig should have said? >Does all this analysis of levels by the numbers >add anything of philosophical value to this ontology? Object? Subject? ALL is valuing set upon Emptiness. Marsha Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars... Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
