Ah, yes, here is where I found it: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/4670/moq.html
and Bo wrote: >As the next oldest participant - after Magnus - I qualify here. BTW >where are these from, the FAQ ..or? Anyway, in my opinion all is valid >except the first part of paragraph four. >There are no other way to divide Quality than the said way I would agree with you for the reason that this distinction is of course the basis of the MOQ. However, a metaphysics isn't reality, but as Pirsig says, another finger pointing to the moon. But of course the best finger. Regards Chris Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
