Magnus:
> With time on the other hand, we don't know Jack
> Schitt,
>
(http://www.twistedhumor.com/program_files/knowjackschitt.html
> :)
> But I think we can find out much more if we just
> take a deep look into
> the quantum level to discover the processes behind
> the concept of time. As
> I've said before, quantum patterns don't obey time,
> just as inorganic patterns
> don't obey taste. In other words, time is created by
> the quantum level and
> valued by the inorganic. We can see that much, does
> anybody have a suggestion
> as to how we can see more?"
SA: What I've thought about before concerning the moq
levels, and Magnus you bring up a good point here
between taste and time to bring up the obvious
expression in Pirsig's ability to even recognize an
inorganic level with the precision that physics has in
recent centuries is the knowledge that an inorganic
level does exist. We are aware that such an inorganic
level exists. It would seem this level, more than the
other levels would be the more difficult or
historically recent level to even know exists. Thus,
if what would be defined as inorganic is without time
except in the quantum arena, then with this new
knowledge another encyclopedia book appears on the
shelf. These levels do exist based on how much we
know and thus are aware of. I'm not saying I lean one
way or another in if a new level needs to be defined,
simply pointing out how knowledge does give residence
to certain patterns in levels.
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
