Bo,
And this is why your SOL fails.
gray clouds disappeared while zazening,
gray clouds,
eyes closed,
eyes opened,
all blue,
not a cloud in the sky,
SA
> Bo had said:
> > "Thinking" in the intelligence sense has been with
> the Q-evolution
> > since the biological neural network facilitated
> storing of
> > experience, its retrieval and manipulation along
> logical "gates".
> > The Greeks began using intelligence along the S/O
> pattern
> > because "philosophy" necessarily is a search for
> objective truth,
> > thus if the Orientals had their philosophical era
> (the Upanishads
> > not Vedic) before the Greeks they also had their
> intellectual era.
> > However they didn't settle there (like the
> Occidentals) but passed
> > on to a Quality-like stage.
>
> > Ron;
> > The search for objective truth starts with the
> formation of
> > Logical rules. Certainty in meaning must be
> established.
> > SOM begins with the establishment of grammatical
> logic
> > Which Breaks experience into subjects and objects
> creating
> > A propositional statement. Its all to build the
> foundation
> > for a rational argument In which to establish
> "truth" in
> > a standardized paradigm.
>
> I probably get what I deserve in talking to you and
> the spirit from the
> Woods, I have questioned some of Pirsigs points and
> can't appeal to
> his books for support, but ZAMM's Greek part - how
> SOM emerges -
> is one of the most convincing and penetrating
> analyses I know of, and
> there I think Pirsig hit the nail on the head. It
> describes how
> humankind rose from the social mythological level to
> the intellectual
> level by their new-fangled search for eternal
> principles that eventually
> became the notion of truth. That truth necessarily
> must be objective
> resulted in their looking back upon the said
> social-mythological past as
> superstitious and ignorant (read: subjective)
> Logical rules like 2+2=4 are given even animals can
> calculate in a
> most elementary way, and to my knowledge computers
> are hard-wired
> along three logical gates a bit more complicated
> that that (can't
> remember just now what they are) To question the
> most elementary
> MOQ tenets and start on wildly different tracks that
> have no MOQ
> bearing or meaning is a complete waste of time. Talk
> with the Spirit he
> thinks highly of you.
>
> Bye
>
> Bo
>
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
