On Saturday 17May 2008 12:26PM David M writes to Joe: Hi Joe Does not the idea that we even need epistemology presume a metaphuysics, one that probably implies skepticism too? David M
Hi David M and all: ³Culture hands me a set of glasses.² I know what other people accept. I take it on mechanically. I am not skeptical, I am asleep! I don¹t need metaphysics, I need a shock to wake me up. In that scenario everything is connected only ³conscious² and ³mechanical² are different. All right I wake up! My question is what awakened me? Certainly not DQ/SQ¹s relation to SOM, SOL. Awakening, knowing, is different from metaphysics. I am asleep, I don¹t have the slightest idea of what is defined, or undefined. I have to wake up (asleep and awake are epistemology), what alarm clock can I use? I guess I am way behind the eight-ball in your scenario, that is why I couldn¹t fathom your methodology. Joe On 5/17/08 12:26 PM, "David M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Joe > > Does not the idea that we even need epistemology presume a metaphuysics, > one that probably implies skepticism too? > > David M Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
