OK Platt, only one minor "correction" from my side > The limits of logic, language and observation at the quantum level are [what Platt defines as] > fundamental Truths. [with a capital T]
All I would say, is that they are not all that fundamental if those limits are themseves evolving - which they are, so I still don't understand why these are privelidged to get the capital T. They are just the current known limits, are they not ? Like what's so special about "the quantum level" - is that the last word in physics as far as you are concerned ? Without re-stating again examples of WHICH truths are Truth, I'm asking a defintional question as to WHAT makes them fundamental [to you] ? Ian Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
