Quoting ian glendinning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > OK Platt, only one minor "correction" from my side > > > The limits of logic, language and observation at the quantum level are > [what Platt defines as] > > fundamental Truths. > [with a capital T] > > All I would say, is that they are not all that fundamental if those > limits are themseves evolving - which they are, so I still don't > understand why these are privelidged to get the capital T. They are > just the current known limits, are they not ? Like what's so special > about "the quantum level" - is that the last word in physics as far as > you are concerned ?
You know of lower level? > Without re-stating again examples of WHICH truths are Truth, I'm > asking a defintional question as to WHAT makes them fundamental [to > you] ? I have explained at at least three times. If you don't agree, so be it. I ask you, is "They are just the current know limits" a fundamental Truth? ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
