Dare I point out, that this weeks BBC "In Our Time" is on the subject of "probability" http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/inourtime/inourtime.shtml Ian
On 5/29/08, Arlo Bensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Platt] > But to the extent that one follows Dynamic Quality, which is undefinable, > one's behavior is free. > > [Arlo] > You've stated before that "only man responds to Dynamic Quality". Does this > mean that man's behavior is the only thing in the universe that is not > deterministic? > > If not, since you've said a cat cannot respond to Dynamic Quality, how is > his behavior "free"? Or is your cat governed strictly by deterministic laws? > > Or are you going to say now, and agree with me, that your cat can indeed > respond to DQ (making it "free" from deterministic laws, albeit "less free" > than man whose respond to DQ includes social and intellectual level > affordances)? > > So which is it? Is your cat's behavior "free"? If so, is it because it can > "follow Dynamic Quality"? And if not, how else can it be "free"? > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
