To ALL:

First I would like to thank Ron and Bodvar attempting to answer the
questions as I laid them out. I would like to thank Marsha for the moral
support and Ian also supporting the idea for a greater need for the defining
both the social and intellectual level. And thank you all who I have missed
Gav, Chris...

 

The first exercise (gauntlet I) was pretty interesting discussion wish but
bearing very limited fruit.  It kind of is like being in a room of drunken
sailors, nice guys with a bunch of their own idea's drifting in and out of
lucid consciousness.  Ok put your drinks down or get yourself another round,
whatever suits you best. :-) I need you to think about this next problem
which is in the form of a scenario. 

 

Before I give you the scenario I will be upfront with what I am up to.  If
you read my conference paper (2005) that I submitted (Yawn, Yawn) you will
note that this issue of defining the difference between the social and
intellectual level is key problem.  I proposed that perhaps an academic
group might come together and to develop and assess possible definitions.
Hmmmm. it was 2005 (about 1000 days ago or), 3 years ago since the last
conference and I am not aware of any specific institution of higher learning
endorsing MOQ in any respect and no conference on the horizon.  So perhaps I
will enlist you guys to perhaps help with this issue and see if we can make
some progress, perhaps working together as group.  

 

Here is the scenario:

 

You are a doctoral student studying Scandinavian Cultures.  You tend to be
interested in the Ugro-Finnic languages and the cultures of Finland and
Estonia.  You also are interested in the generational differences found in
various cultures.  It has been over 10 years since Estonia has been
liberated from Soviet oppression.  As a country you note Estonia has
progressed both culturally and economically in line with other Scandinavian
countries since its freedom.  In a recent visit to Estonia you noted some
stark generational differences between those individuals 30-35 year of age
(we will call them the pre-Soviet liberated generation) and those 20-30
years of age (post-Soviet Liberated generation).  You want to study the
differences and similarities of intellectual and social values of the
pre/post Soviet Liberated generations. 

 

You have met with you doctoral advisor is generally supportive of your
research idea but has a limited understanding of MOQ and has raised the
following questions. 

 

1.       How does your definition or understanding of intellectual
level/value differentiate the social level from the intellectual level as
well as social values from intellectual values?  Please provide examples of
both intellectual and social values and share how your definitions of each
level are able to clearly discern the levels. 

 

2.       Given there is a evolutionary process to each of the levels, what
is a possible historical point in which represents the likelihood for the
birth of the Intellectual level, and what is the basis for this
period/event(s) chosen and how intellectual level changed or remained the
same over time. 

 

3.       It seems clear that both social and intellectual levels use
language, but in different ways.  Please describe how each level utilizes
language to sustain its level? 

 

4.       Given that intellectual values dominate it's parent level, the
social level, yet must sustain and maintain a relative harmony with the
social level.  Given your definition or understanding of intellectual levels
how do intellectual values do that? 

 

Ok you are about to go into your first meeting of doctorial committee to
pitch your research idea and this group is who will eventually approve or
nix your research proposal.  You have heard they are generally interested in
you research idea but again know nothing about MOQ. Your Doctorial advisor
has asked you to be ready to provide a general overview of MOQ and to
provide answers the questions for the meeting.  He strongly urges you to be
precise and clear about your answers and if you wish to cite RMP or others
to support your answers, great it adds credibility.  Remember no flowery
bull, no discussion about intellectual freedom, that pisses doctorial
committees off in a hurry. 

 

I doubt any one of you might be able to answer the questions alone, and it
might take a coordinated effort or perhaps a group effort. As far as
research topics I realize that what I made up has various limitations and
may be too broad.  The proposal process works to address that issue.  What
the proposal process won't do is do your work to provide a definition of
what are social and intellectual values from a MOQ perspective.  You will
need to do that in such a way that merits validity and integrity and meets
academic muster with your committee.  

 

Now in I will be changing my email address in the upcoming week so after
Monday or Tuesday I will be out of communication with the group for several
days. If you have any general questions or ideas as to how one might address
such a scenario let me know before then or it might be a several day delay. 

 

Sincerely, 

Dr. Mati Palm-Leis 

 

 

 

 

 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to