[Craig, previously] > a primate "troop leader" is biological, but a calvary troop > leader is social.
[Krimel] > Obviously I think that both are social and the only way to conclude > otherwise is to adopt a taxonomic system that ignores the structure, > function, origins and development of the matter under question. So actually look at "the structure, function, origins and developmentof the matter under question".If an agressive primate attacks & replaces a troop leader, it is actingmorally. But if a cavalry member does the same, it is not acting morally(unless there is a justification).Craig Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
