Platt .... I'm not biting .... Arlo is doing the dirty work for us at the moment.
(Since you are in fact anti-intellectual, there is no point me even attempting an intellectual answer to your social question - you may have heard me call that Catch-22 before. I was just making sure Ron understood my position re the Arlo / Platt exchanges.) Ian On 7/24/08, Platt Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > My first sentence / paragraph was (explicityly) about "conservatives" > > > > My second sentence the one you snip and quote was (explicitly) about you > > Platt. > > > > Not all conservatives are idiots ;-) > > Ian > > How then am I "anti-intellectual?" > > > > On 7/24/08, Platt Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [Ian] > > > > Yet, the paradox I find with Platt - the internal inconsistency, > > which > > > > confirms to me it is all just unthinking slogan-speak - is that he > > > > subscribes to an MoQ where Level 4 is "above" Level 3 in evolved > > > > patterns of quality .... yet he is shamelessly and quite explicitly > > > > "anti-intellectual". > > > > > > Oh? How so? Are conservatives like William Buckley, Milton Friedman, > > F.A. > > > Hayek and Ayn Rand "anti-intellectual?" > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
