Sir, I don't know what you are implying!?

-Peter

2008/7/30 Ron Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>
> Hold on Pete, Bo will be with you shortly.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter
> Corteen
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 11:41 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [MD] Tit's
>
> Hi david,
>
> As I see it SOM is hard wired in us: we are genetically predisposed to
> it.
> You said that SOM is 'an interpretation of the qualities felt in
> experience', but it's stronger than that: your use of  the word
> 'interpretation' implies that we make a conscious choice to see things
> in
> that way but my point is that there is no choice. Therefore, there is no
> 'stepping back'  to see subjects and objects in a different light.
> Most philosophers are too stuck in the head and most mystics are only
> peddling SOM kind of life after death line for their own personal
> glorification; but I do agree that 'experience comes first' and that
> experience, rather than identification with the constant stream of
> mental
> associations and social considerings, is facilitated by relaxation and
> an
> awareness of the whole body rather than having the locus of attention
> only
> in the head.
>
> -Peter
>
> 2008/7/30 david buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >
> > Peter said to dmb:
> > ...the 'experience of not being able to walk through is more real than
> the
> > "wall"'. SOM is an indispensable convention that we are hard wired
> with. You
> > can't have mind without matter and vice-versa; I acknowledge spirit
> only in
> > terms of intentionality. What will be the characteristics of those
> beings
> > who are not limited by SOM?
> >
> > dmb says:
> > SOM is hard wired? I'd say that "mind" and "matter" are just like the
> > "wall". They're an interpretation of the qualities felt in experience.
> The
> > same idea applies to mind, matter, walls or anything else one could
> name.
> > Like I said, rejecting SOM in no way denies the experience from which
> these
> > ideas are derived, it is simply a matter of stepping back to see that
> > subjects and objects are conventional interpretations of experience
> rather
> > than the cause of experience. The MOQ says that experience comes
> first, that
> > experience IS reality.
> >
> > I suppose there are at least two kinds of "beings" who are not limited
> by
> > SOM; philosophers and mystics. In other words, rejecting SOM can be a
> matter
> > of thinking it through or it can be rejected on the basis of an
> experience
> > wherein all dualisms evaporate in favor of unity or the One. If you're
> an
> > infant, a dog or if you were raised by Buddhists in Japan then the
> limits of
> > SOM simply don't figure into the equation.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Stay in touch when you're away with Windows Live Messenger.
> >
> >
> http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_mes
> senger2_072008<http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_messenger2_072008>
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> >
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to