> Mr Gavin Gee-Clough! > I asked you a question a few days ago, if I have overlooked your > reply please direct me to it. The said question was this: > > On 31 July you wrote to Krimel: > > > gav: if you are talking of S and O (as primary; and you are), then > > we are in SOM. yep that old familiar terrain where objects are > > objects and subjects are subjects and never the twain shall mingle. > > Agree, but where are we when we are in SOM? That's the > #¤&%¤# question. Not in another metaphysical universe, because > the MOQ is supposed to have subsumed SOM. At an evil pattern > that has hijacked an otherwise neutral intellect, or smack in the > middle of the 4th. level itself? > > If anyone else has an opinion, please ...
We think we're in SOM whenever we think. But we're actually in MOQ all the time. Just my 2 cents worth. Regards, Platt Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
