The intellectual level points to the moon. The MOQ embraces the moon. Platt
> You can't get away that lightly Bo, > > If you really are agreeing with that ... as I thought we had in the > past anyway ... then our only disagreement is how this is actually > expressed in the MoQ levels and patterns. > > The MoQ intellectual level MUST be more than SOMism .... SOMism will > just find itself to be (or to have been) a "static pattern" as MoQ > intellect (and language) continues to evolve. > > The historical dividing line between social and intellectual may well > be the original evolution of SOMism, and that will remain as a > historial fact that once distinguished intellectual from social, but > the "definition" of intellectual continues to evolve. > > Ian > > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 5:45 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ian said: > >> Blimey, I agree with Platt again ... "We think we're in SOM whenever > >> we think. But we're actually in MOQ all the time." > > > >> That's a neat way to put the problem we have arguing to anything like > >> conclusions, because our thought and talk is (mostly) hidebound by > our > >> SOMist heritage. Even those of us that just "know" we are MoQists, > can > >> help tripping up over the SOMism in our arguments, thought or > expressed. > >> (Is this the "Ker-Ching", in the Ron / DMB thread ?) > > > > I can only say: Amen! > > Bo > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
