Arlo -- [Ham, peviously]:
I've acknowledged that, from the existential or causal perspective, Home sapiens evolved from more primitive creatures as per Darwin's theory of natural selection.
[Arlo]:
Did these more primitive creatures (lets say the apes from which we evolved way back in prehistory) possess consciousness? If not, would you posit that "consciousness" is the result of a genetic mutation of some sort? To be more precise, where in the evolutionary tree of "man" did consciousness first appear, and to what to you ascribe the appearance of "consciousness" to (it sounds genetic, but I'll wait to hear your answer)?
I don't know what what "sounds genetic" about consciousness. Genetic mutations, nerve synapses, and brain structures takes such forms as are necessary to accommodate the thought process. These organic developments are secondary to Consciousness which is the faculty or sense of 'knowing' that defines every subject's being-aware. Consciousness is not an existent like a physical body, table, or tree. It is not found in the frontal lobes, the cerebellum, or any part of the brain because it is not an object. It is localized only by inference to the biological organism from which come words, gestures, and expression of thought. But the physical body is only the 'being" part of being-aware.
Yes, I believe all living creatures possess some form of sensibility, and I do not exclude the possibilty of self-awarenss in cerebrates other than man. However, man is unique in his capacity to discriminate aesthetic, moral, and utilitarian values, such as are evident in his creativity, morality, aesthetic appreciation, scientific progress, and intellectual contributions. I'm not really concerned with the origin of man as a species, or the particular era in anthropological history when intellection was first exhibited. That's the kind of specious information we expect from scientists and historians.
More significant to the philosopher is that we are the 'valuistic' creature, and the world we create represents those values which are important or vital to us. Thus, until we realize that value-sensibility is our essence, that human life is sacred, and that what we value determines what we are as existents, we shall never have a moral world. IMO that's what philosophy is all about.
Regards, Ham
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
