Bo: "Fuss about about a 5th level". I simply claim that the MOQ is the metaphysics that has intellect as a subset, consequently it can't be an intellectual pattern. This makes the MOQ a "meta-level". Try logic for a change.
Ron: I did try that logic and came to the conclusion that it is faulty and re-establishes all the essentialist notions within it. It simply solves by redefinition. Which doesn't change anything. Let me add that I did make a well thought out logical argument with references and support as to why I feel this is so and all you could come up with is petty insults and P.T. Barnum rhetoric. which amounted to "nuh-uh" so why don't you take some of your own advice and try logic for a change, I mean real analytics, not some half baked un-researched line of elitist bullshit that you try to pass off as "logic". Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
