> Ron: > I'd agree, why are you asserting it? the assertion we make is that > science is one of many ways to distinguish experience. This seems to > make you go > all Platt on us jumping to either/or scenarios of the argument when it > just isn't the case.
If you are going to introduce my name in a pejorative way, you could at least have the courtesy to elaborate with examples of "jumping to either/or scenarios when it just isn't the case," especially since your invoking of "isn't" presumes an is/is not, either/or scenario. Platt, I apologize, that was rather rude of me. But in all honesty you have demonstrated that capacity to switch to an either/or debate structure rather consistently. But I guess we all do depending on those things we seem to value the most. sincerely -Ron Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
