[Krimel]
I think this also would be helpful with regards to your confusion about
pluralism and essentialism. The pluralism that I would support and I think
is consistent with the MoQ and with James is that there are many ways to
understand the world around us. This is epistemological pluralism.
You have turned this into a metaphysical pluralism that I think has been
rejected by nearly everyone who has seriously addressed the issue from Lao
Tsu, Buddha and Jesus to Einstein, Darwin and James.
DM: The thing I wouldsay in support of metaphysical pluralism is
that it suggests that it is all real, all levels of SQ are as real as any
other,
it rejects any formof essentialism. There is just energy and its many forms,
Aristotle said that -often mistranslated as matter and form.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
