> > Ron: > > What I have difficulty with is that you use our western definition of > > intellect as a universal blanket definition of intelligence across the > > board. What this does is place our definition of intellect as THE > > definition > > of intellect and it places SOLAQI as evolutionarily superior with you > > being > > the pinnacle by virtue of the fact that you are the only one who > > subscribes. > > Ron: > Count me in as one who subscribes to SOLAQI as the Intellectual Level of > > the MOQ, at least in so far as I understand SOLAQI to be. I view all > levels > as defined by what is dominant in them. For me what dominates the > Intellectual Level is the S/O division and the assumption of > determinism. > > Ron: > Hello Platt, > Do you agree that the highest social values define intellectual > patterns?
Ron: If that means the highest social values are languages, then I agree. If it means the highest social values are conformity and consensus, then I disagree. Thanks for asking. Platt Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
