DQ is constant,static patterns move ... Verily! mortals entertain!!
----- Original Message ---- From: Christoffer Ivarsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 10:38:33 AM Subject: Re: [MD] Can DQ be Bad? I wholeheartedly disagree. First of, DQ is constant and the dynamic aspect occurs when static patterns move toward/perceive/word that fit's a new aspect of Quality. Thus DQ is never bad, but if the movement towards new Quality understanding/being/word that fits makes the static pattern too unstable "it" is to "blame". And the hot stove thing - that is bad biological quality isn't it? Granted it can be Dynamic if a biological being has never encountered a hot stove before, and then it is a new Quality understanding, but that understanding is incorporated into the understanding of Good and Bad of the biological level. //Chris > dmb said: > Yes, Krimel, DQ has a negative face. Chaos and confusion and degeneracy > ensues when things are too dynamic. > > Krimel replied: > At last, perhaps the MoQ can move forward. > > dmb replies to the reply: > The MOQ can move forward? This negative aspect of DQ has been part of the > MOQ since the day it was published. Sitting on hot stoves is no picnic, > for > example. > > [Krimel] > Unbelievably, dmb and I seem to have found some common ground. Before it > turns to quicksand, who will join us in admitting that DQ is not always > "Good" or even "good"? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
