Mortal Fool, let it be writ Chaos is your master naught else Hell awaits thine worship at the temple of law
fangs dripping the idols of heaven are forged by the smythes of Hell ~^~ ----- Original Message ---- From: Christoffer Ivarsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 10:38:33 AM Subject: Re: [MD] Can DQ be Bad? I wholeheartedly disagree. First of, DQ is constant and the dynamic aspect occurs when static patterns move toward/perceive/word that fit's a new aspect of Quality. Thus DQ is never bad, but if the movement towards new Quality understanding/being/word that fits makes the static pattern too unstable "it" is to "blame". And the hot stove thing - that is bad biological quality isn't it? Granted it can be Dynamic if a biological being has never encountered a hot stove before, and then it is a new Quality understanding, but that understanding is incorporated into the understanding of Good and Bad of the biological level. //Chris > dmb said: > Yes, Krimel, DQ has a negative face. Chaos and confusion and degeneracy > ensues when things are too dynamic. > > Krimel replied: > At last, perhaps the MoQ can move forward. > > dmb replies to the reply: > The MOQ can move forward? This negative aspect of DQ has been part of the > MOQ since the day it was published. Sitting on hot stoves is no picnic, > for > example. > > [Krimel] > Unbelievably, dmb and I seem to have found some common ground. Before it > turns to quicksand, who will join us in admitting that DQ is not always > "Good" or even "good"? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
