At 08:16 AM 9/19/2008, you wrote:
Hi Marsha

You wrote "I think you (Bo) and many others"?  Who else are you addressing?

Can't think of anyone in particular right now, but since my view of the MoQ's levels quite recently evolved because some observations didn't quite fit in my old view, I'd say that I can find some pile of "r" in every other view.

On the other hand, most others here are quite fuzzy when it comes to details about the levels, they mostly claim they are just one convenient way to view reality, not reality in itself.

You are not talking about things-in-themselves, are you? Because they do no exist within the MOQ. Right? This is, of course, related to my question in the Pattern thread.

Yes, I saw that. But yes, I'm talking about things-in-themselves. What else? And I very much think they exist within the MoQ, otherwise I wouldn't be so dead set on trying to explain them within the MoQ's levels.

Think of it this way. If the MoQ were to say that things doesn't really exist, it would invalidate everything that physics, and all other sciences, have ever accomplished. It would say something like:

- Well, guys, it's very convincing and such, but I'm afraid non of it is real cause we can't make heads or tails of it philosophically.

Then science would simply laugh at philosophy and go on with its own business anyway. But I think philosophy *can* help, but then it must of course acknowledge the reality of what the sciences are doing, and that's a big part of what my latest essay is about.

        Magnus

Greeting Magnus,

Those that first proposed the world to be round, instead of flat, were the source of much laughter. In the MOQ there are no things-in-themselves. This is clearly stated in the Copleston paper. The MOQ does not invalidate everything that physics, and all other sciences has ever accomplished. It now views these accomplishments from a broader perspective. It's mutually, interdependent, static patterns of value instead of things-in-themselves. Hasn't physics been moving in that direction any ways?

Marsha





.
.

Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to