Hi Magnus 24 Sep. wrote:
> Please Bo, I asked a simple question and I asked you to answer it in > MoQ terms. But no, you have to give me a lecture about some cosmology > I've never even heard, much less care about. Then you go on with your > usual rant about your SOL and that your MoQ does *not* explain a bunch > of questions that mine does. For the benefit of us mortals please present the solution to you own riddle. You originally asked: > What type of pattern is the observed data of a falling stone? Bo before: > > Well, this your "instant philosophy" is beyond me, the social level > > had/has lots of explanations - from the "primitive" animated world > > to modern religions with god-created worlds. > It's the intellectual description of the social level that may explain > certain social behavior. But a social pattern is just a certain > valuable way by which many "things" cooperate as one and doesn't > include an explanation in itself. If we hark back to the Stone Age, people inhabiting a region had their special myth (explanation) on the emergence and destiny of the world. Was this the intellectual LEVEL at work? Or is the gist of your above that the MOQ - its system of levels - is an intellectual description, thus when we speak about the various levels' patterns they are "intellect" regardless. Waiting Bo Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
